Rep Managment is important especially for public figures.

There’s no way I could post the name of this individual, or even hint at it, as all client inquiries and projects are 100% confidential. There’s a lot of stuff that I come across that would be very interesting to blog about, but I can’t.

I agree that reason can be a good way of going about things in some cases, but oftentimes, reason = FAIL.

The best and only way to fix things is to open the ears, fix the reason the company was negatively pressed and make it publicly known, because positive press travels slowly.

It isn’t about Google, more about the company, really.

These reputation crisis are really hard to repair but, are they so difficult to prevent?. I mean, the question could be why we don’t focus our efforts in avoid the crisis instead of hide bad results. Is prevention possible if big companies measure risks before, and they monitor social and mass media then?.

We could make this if we build webs and links related to the target before (adding also terms as ‘bad’, ‘problems’, “fail”, etc.) and then we try to talk fast with people is complaining. If mass media wants to destroy the brand there is nothing to do, but maybe we can reduce costs in other cases, and get more work in not so impossible ones.

I believe repairing can be the last option to online reputation managers, and SEO tactics are not our main tool. How to sell ORM services before crisis?

Regards,

Bob